The parts in red are Strategies. | |
Report Style: Report | |
Published: 21 December 2004 | |
Price: $7,600 | |
Introduction | |
With cost-containment a focus for all healthcare payers, the growth of the generics market is outpacing the branded sector by a considerable margin. However, the operating environment for generics is becoming increasingly competitive pushing existing players further up the pharmaceutical value chain. Brand and generics companies alike must be prepared for this new competition. | |
Scope of this report | |
Capabilities and portfolio analysis of the top 20 generics companies operating in each of the US, Germany, UK, France, Spain and Italy | |
Case study-based insight into the effectiveness of 15 portfolio management, marketing and growth strategies available to generics players | |
Strategic profiles of 20 leading generics companies, including growth strategy, competitive positioning and alliance network analysis | |
Analysis of the country-specific patent expiries for global blockbuster drugs | |
Research and analysis highlights | |
With 79.7% of 2003 blockbuster sales potentially exposed to generic competition by 2010, equating to $103.7 billion worth of products at 2003 sales value, the growth opportunities in the generics sector are significant. However, understanding how different country dynamics shape the competitive landscape is critical to evaluating risk and return. | |
Effective portfolio management is critical to future success in the generics market. Maintaining breadth of portfolio and low cost supply is critical for commodity generics players, forcing many players to evaluate higher value generic sectors, thus generating new competitors to brand pharma. | |
In the US, the generic injectables sector retains high barriers to entry, but in Europe, competitive analysis suggests that the market place is more crowded. As such, injectable products may represent a less valuable proposition to European generics players than US analysis would suggest. | |
Key reasons to read this report | |
Identify the optimal portfolio management strategy for your company and the implications of those of your rivals | |
Identify the likely rivals to your brand or generic in each of the six major markets | |
Assess the implications of generics company strategic development on the success of your late stage lifecycle management strategies | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS | |
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | 3 |
Scope | 3 |
Datamonitor's opinion on the current and future generics market | 3 |
With 79.7% of 2003 blockbuster sales potentially exposed to generic competition by 2010, equating to $103.7 billion worth of products at 2003 sales value, the growth opportunities in the generics sector are significant. However, understanding how different country dynamics shape the competitive landscape is critical to evaluating risk and return | 4 |
Effective portfolio management is critical to future success in the generics market. Maintaining breadth of portfolio and low cost supply is critical for commodity generics players, forcing many players to evaluate higher value generic sectors, thus generating new competitors to brand pharma | 6 |
In the US, the generic injectables sector retains high barriers to entry, but in Europe, competitive analysis suggests that the market place is more crowded. As such, injectable products may represent a less valuable proposition to European pharma than US analysis would suggest | 8 |
CHAPTER 2 GENERICS MARKET DYNAMICS | 21 |
Key findings | 21 |
Global market sizes | 22 |
Future market potential | 26 |
Company positioning | 28 |
Geographic focus of major generics companies | 30 |
Country-specific analysis | 31 |
US | 32 |
Overview | 32 |
Company positioning by product type | 34 |
Major companies' strategic areas of focus | 38 |
Future market potential | 41 |
UK | 43 |
Overview | 43 |
Major companies' strategic areas of focus | 43 |
Future market potential | 47 |
Germany | 48 |
Overview | 48 |
Company positioning by product type | 50 |
Major companies' strategic areas of focus | 53 |
Future market potential | 57 |
France | 59 |
Overview | 59 |
Company positioning by product type | 61 |
Major companies' strategic areas of focus | 64 |
Future market potential | 66 |
Spain | 68 |
Overview | 68 |
Company positioning by product type | 69 |
Major companies' strategic areas of focus | 72 |
Future market potential | 75 |
Italy | 77 |
Overview | 77 |
Company positioning by product type | 78 |
Major companies' strategic areas of focus | 82 |
Future market potential | 84 |
CHAPTER 3 KEY GENERICS STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS | 86 |
Key findings | 86 |
Overview | 87 |
Portfolio management strategies | 87 |
Commodity generics focus | 87 |
Case study - Apotex | 89 |
Case study - Sandoz | 89 |
Outlook | 90 |
Paragraph IV challenges | 91 |
Terms of 180-day exclusivity | 93 |
Potential revision of 180-day exclusivity provision | 93 |
30-month stays | 94 |
An increasingly favourable environment for patent challenges | 95 |
Launching generics "at-risk" | 96 |
The threat from 'authorized generics' | 97 |
Case study - Barr Laboratories | 98 |
Case study - Teva | 99 |
Case study - Ranbaxy | 99 |
Case study - Dr Reddy's | 100 |
Outlook | 100 |
Specialty generics focus | 101 |
Modified-release generics | 101 |
Injectable generics | 105 |
Inhalable generics | 109 |
Topical generics | 110 |
Transdermal generics | 112 |
Products requiring regulatory support or handling restrictions | 113 |
Outlook | 115 |
Supergenerics focus | 115 |
Is there a market for supergenerics? | 116 |
Regulatory situation | 117 |
Outlook | 122 |
Biogenerics focus | 123 |
Uncertainty over regulatory situation | 124 |
Progress with the US regulatory pathway | 125 |
The EU regulatory pathway - one step ahead | 127 |
Early approvals - limited to first generation products? | 128 |
Cost and marketing of biogenerics | 129 |
Biogenerics development in the less regulated markets | 130 |
Companies well-placed to lead the biogenerics market | 131 |
Outlook | 134 |
Branded/innovative products focus | 136 |
Key companies involved in in-house R&D | 137 |
Key companies involved in branded product licensing/acquisitions | 141 |
Outlook | 145 |
Niche markets | 146 |
Case study - Impax | 147 |
Outlook | 147 |
Therapeutic focus | 148 |
Case study - Barr, seizing the opportunity in women's health | 149 |
Case study - NeuraxPharm, entirely focused on CNS generics | 150 |
Case study - Alpharma in Germany | 151 |
Case study - Teva | 151 |
Outlook | 151 |
Marketing Strategies | 152 |
Branded generics | 152 |
Specialty branded generics | 153 |
Branded generics in specific geographic markets such as Germany | 157 |
'Authorized' or 'friendly' generics | 159 |
Case study - Mylan, strongly opposed to authorized generics | 161 |
Case study - GSK's settlement with Par, authorizing generic Paxil | 162 |
Case study - STADA's "early entry" with mirtazapine in Germany | 163 |
Generic alliances | 164 |
Case study - Teva and Alpharma partnering on gabapentin | 164 |
Case study - licensing of first-to-file status for omeprazole | 166 |
Case study - Mayne Pharma licensing paclitaxel | 167 |
Growth Strategies | 168 |
Vertical integration | 168 |
Advantages of integration | 168 |
Advantages of out-sourcing API | 170 |
Geographical growth | 172 |
US companies | 174 |
Other companies | 177 |
Growth through Mergers and Acquisitions | 180 |
Partnerships | 183 |
API sourcing partnerships | 183 |
Marketing partnerships | 185 |
Partnerships case study - Teva | 186 |
CHAPTER 4 STRATEGIC COMPANY PROFILES | 190 |
Financial measures | 190 |
Benchmarking by profitability | 190 |
Benchmarking by operating costs | 192 |
Benchmarking by financial strength | 194 |
Profiles of leading companies | 196 |
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries | 196 |
Sandoz | 198 |
IVAX Pharmaceuticals | 200 |
Merck KGaA | 202 |
Watson Pharmaceuticals | 204 |
ratiopharm | 206 |
Hexal | 207 |
Barr Pharmaceuticals | 209 |
Mylan Laboratories | 211 |
Apotex | 213 |
Alpharma | 215 |
Ranbaxy | 217 |
STADA | 219 |
Par Pharmaceutical | 222 |
PLIVA | 224 |
Mayne Pharma | 226 |
Taro Pharmaceuticals | 227 |
Gedeon Richter | 228 |
Andrx | 230 |
Dr Reddy's | 231 |
CHAPTER 5 APPENDIX | 234 |
2006/6/18
Global Generics Guide 3rd Edition: Benchmarking Generics Company Capabilities and Strategy
訂閱:
張貼留言 (Atom)
沒有留言:
張貼留言